Skip to content

Radio jammers, GPS trackers targeted in expanding B.C. civil forfeiture program

B.C. Civil Forfeiture Office seeks to add more regulatory bodies it can obtain information from, including the B.C. Securities Commission and BC Hydro
Cullen Commission January 5 2021
The Commission of Inquiry into Money Laundering in B.C. headed by Justice Austin Cullen (top) heard from B.C. Civil Forfeiture Office executive director Phil Tawtel (right), who took questions from commission counsel Patrick McGowan (left) on Dec. 18, 2020.

The B.C. Minister of Public Safety is expanding a program that allows government to forfeit seized property considered to be proceeds of criminal activity not proven in a court of law.

The B.C. Civil Forfeiture Office (CFO), which received criticism at the Commission of Inquiry into Money Laundering in B.C. last year, is broadening its program in many facets.

First, it's redefining what is “likely to cause serious bodily harm,” in order to add more items it could forfeit. And it's adding two new communications tools being used by organized crime and drug trafficking suspects to an existing list of what it may forfeit.

Those tools cited in a Friday news release are radio jammers and GPS trackers. Criminals use jammers to block the ability of police using GPS to monitor them and to block radio communication by authorities, said the ministry.

And GPS trackers are being used by drug traffickers to track rivals they are “targeting with violence or to keep tabs on subordinates, vehicles and high-value contraband items such as guns and drugs,” added the ministry.

"We need to ensure that our civil forfeiture program is working as well as it can, so when police advise us about how drug gangs and organized crime are changing the ways they do business in B.C., we are committed to taking necessary steps to keep pace," said Mike Farnworth, Minister of Public Safety and Solicitor General. "These latest regulatory changes build on the legislative updates we made in 2019 and will help reduce violent crime and other activities that pose clear risks to public safety."

Fiona Wilson, deputy chief of the investigation division, Vancouver Police Department, said it was important to be able to seize these tools.

But the CFO appears not done with expanding its powers.

“The CFO is also formalizing its ability to secure specific information from more public bodies, which can strengthen cases against money laundering and gang activity. Public bodies added to the prescribed list in the regulation include the BC Securities Commission, the Motor Dealer Council, the BC Lottery Corporation, BC Hydro and BC Assessment.”

Details have yet to be announced.

The office must apply to the court to forfeit seized property, including property suspected of being proceeds of crime. If a person does not contest an application by the office or comes to a consent agreement, the property is deemed a proceed of crime however the person admits no personal wrongdoing. The office uses police evidence in cases but does not conduct investigations. However, it can compel government bodies to provide information. A common seized item may be a vehicle and so it may compel ICBC for registration data, for example.

One may contest a forfeiture application by the office by providing proof the property wasn't used for proceeds of criminal activity. 

This has raised significant concerns among lawyers and specifically the BC Civil Liberties Association.

The association asserts civil forfeiture lacks judicial oversight, undermines access to justice and lacks transparency. On the whole, the forfeiture regime may not even be effective, it told the money laundering inquiry last year.

“There is a serious risk that police will rely on civil forfeiture as a shortcut to avoid conducting a proper criminal investigation.”

The inquiry has heard how federal RCMP have been ineffective at prosecuting money laundering crimes.

The CFO's executive director Phil Tawtel told the inquiry the office has seized $114 million worth of cash and items since inception 10 years ago. About 35% goes to court fees, 15% to run the office and 50% goes back to community-level crime prevention.

This article was updated January 19, 2022 for clarity on the civil forfeiture process

push icon
Be the first to read breaking stories. Enable push notifications on your device. Disable anytime.
No thanks