Dear Editor:
Re: Pipeline questions: From terrorism to expropriation, Burnaby NOW, May 14.
The article caught my attention as it related to a controversial topic. The article outlined the major environmental and economic risks in relation to Burnaby associated with the proposed Kinder Morgan pipeline. It criticized the company's emergency preparedness, effects on the surrounding real estate market and expropriation concerns. Although all of these concerns are legitimate in their own right, it would be much easier for all stakeholders if there was a comprehensive, provincewide energy policy.
The biggest problem with this debate is that it is centred on the challenges associated with a specific project rather than on a more comprehensive approach to energy in our province.
In order to limit risks and move towards a better, more sustainable future, we must first decide on a set of energy priorities for the province, taking into account our economic, environmental and energy needs. Deciding on such criteria in a clear manner will allow our province to make informed decisions about the future.
Furthermore, we have to examine our options realistically and decide where we want to invest our resources. For example, alternative energy works well when discussing the future and environmental sustainability, but do we have a realistic plan to put it into action and are we ready to commit to a changed way of life given the current economic outlook?
Consulting on individual projects becomes easier if we settle the bigger questions first.
A provincewide consensus on our future energy requirements and plans that consider the full consequences to our own way of life is the way to go.
Bushra Gabreldar, Burnaby
